Onses to intergroup interactions. The present investigation also showed that Latinas
Onses to intergroup interactions. The present analysis also showed that Latinas’ beliefs about Whites’ motives predicted greater threatavoidance following constructive feedback from Whites more than and above person differences in interpersonal rejection sensitivity (Experiment ), ethnic stigma consciousness (Experiment 2), and racebased rejection sensitivity (Experiment 3). As a result, even though greater suspicion of Whites’ motives is modestly related with far more damaging intergroup perceptions and higher racebased rejection expectations among minorities (Main et al 203), these research illustrate that suspicion of Whites’ motives for nonprejudiced behavior uniquely relates to responses to constructive feedback in intergroup interactions. Contributions and Implications with the Current Perform This operate extends prior study on intergroup relations within a quantity of crucial strategies. Whereas a substantial amount of research has examined how Whites’ racial attitudes, beliefs, and motivations for prejudiced (or nonprejudiced) behavior affect interracial interactions, individual variations in ethnic minorities’ beliefs and their implications for interracial interactions have already been somewhat neglected within the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295272 psychological literature. The existing operate extends prior research by focusing on differences within minority groups and person by circumstance interactions as determinants of cognition, influence, and physiology in intergroup interactions. The present function also extends prior research by focusing on how ethnic minorities respond to positive evaluations in intergroup interactions. Findings highlight the limitations of assuming that all members of minority groups respond the identical way in intergroup interactions. While numerous studies have examined the implications of Whites’ levels of internal and external motivations to prevent prejudice on their responses in interracial contexts (e.g Kunstman, Plant, Zielaskowski, LaCosse, 203; Plant, Devine, Peruche, 200), untilJ Exp Soc Psychol. SC66 web Author manuscript; out there in PMC 207 January 0.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMajor et al.Pagenow research has not examined the implications of minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ internal and external motivations for interracial interactions. They are the initial experiments to examine the association in between minorities’ suspicions about Whites’ motives and their reactions to optimistic feedback directed toward themselves in intergroup interactions. Since the behavior from the interaction companion was held constant inside the existing studies, our findings illustrate the value of chronic perceptions of others’ motivations to respond with out prejudice. Results suggest two intriguing but as however untested possibilities. 1st, perceptions of motives might be just as significant as actual motives in shaping intergroup interactions. Second, suspicion of Whites’ motives for offering good feedback may well explain why minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ friendliness have a tendency to rely additional heavily on nonverbal than verbal cues (Dovidio et al 2002). The latter could be perceived as far more controllable, and hence as more disingenuous. The present analysis illustrates that chronically perceiving Whites’ positive responses toward ethnic minorities as disingenuous as motivated mainly by external issues with appearing unprejudiced is connected to improved feelings of tension, uncertainty, and threat avoidance among minorities once they obtain optimistic evaluation.
