By the local ethical committee of Central University of Finance and
By the local ethical committee of Central University of Finance and Economics. All participants gave written informed consent.PLOS One particular plosone.orgHomo Economicus Belief Inhibits Trustconstrual)62 (situation: Noneconomic versus Financial) design and style. We hypothesized that the main impact of construal level and the interaction impact among construal level and situation were all not considerable, whereas situation still had a substantial primary impact on trust. As a result, we could identify that it was the financial situation, but not the construal level and their interaction that led to reduce trust.ParticipantsOne hundred and fourteen college students had been randomly assigned into 4 conditions (see Table for their SGI-7079 demographic traits).Supplies and ProceduresFigure . Participants’ trust level inside the survey of trust in other folks and investment game. doi:0.37journal.pone.007667.gParticipantsCollege student participants have been randomly assigned into experimental (N 32, six females, Mage 22.00 years, SD .77) and control circumstances (N 30, 6 females, Mage 2.26 years, SD two.five). Every participant got a pen as bonus.Components and ProceduresFirst, participants necessary to complete a priming task. Inside the experimental condition, participants completed two profit calculation troubles (see Appendix S3), and participants within the control condition completed a reading job in regards to the formation of loess. Second, participants’ trust was measured by the survey of trust in other people since it was employed in Experiment . Ultimately, to check no matter if the profit calculation complications activated participants’ homo economicus belief, participants evaluated their agreements of “Individuals is self interested, they only take part in social interactions that may advantage themselves” on a 7point scale. This item was consistent with the essence of homo economicus belief. The higher they scored on the item, the stronger they agreed using the homo economicus belief.Participants within the noneconomic predicament read a story that Liu Ming decided to study difficult to obtain a high academic record. Participants inside the highlevel construal situation required to report 3 to 5 reasons why Liu Ming wanted a higher academic record; participants inside the lowlevel construal condition needed to propose 3 to 5 recommendations how Liu Ming could get a high academic record. In Chinese, Liu Ming is often a popular name, PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28423228 which suggests nothing unique about gender, race, and so forth. Participants inside the economic predicament were instructed to visualize that heshe was a manager of 1 enterprise. Inside the annual meeting on the corporation, heshe promised that the corporation’s annual growth rate of profit will be 50 . Participants in the highlevel construal condition necessary to list 3 to 5 reasons why the corporation wanted a 50 annual growth price of profit; participants inside the lowlevel construal condition required to recommend 3 to five approaches how that growth price could get achieved. Following completing the priming tasks, participants’ trust level was measured by the survey of trust in others similar to Experiment .Outcomes and also the descriptions of participants’ trust level in 4 circumstances are presented in Table . An evaluation of variance (ANOVA) revealed that participants within the financial predicament displayed a marginally significantly lower trust level (M two.05, SD 0.98) than these inside the noneconomic situation (M two.36, SD 0.75), F (, 0) 3.49, p 0.06, g2 0.03. On the other hand, the primary effect of construal level was not important, F (, 0) 0.99, p.0.05, g2 0.
