Onses to intergroup interactions. The current investigation also showed that Latinas
Onses to intergroup interactions. The existing study also showed that Latinas’ beliefs about Whites’ motives predicted higher threatavoidance following optimistic feedback from Whites over and above person variations in interpersonal rejection sensitivity (Experiment ), ethnic stigma consciousness (Experiment two), and racebased rejection sensitivity (Experiment three). Therefore, although higher suspicion of Whites’ motives is modestly associated with much more damaging intergroup perceptions and greater racebased rejection expectations amongst minorities (Significant et al 203), these studies illustrate that suspicion of Whites’ motives for nonprejudiced behavior uniquely relates to responses to constructive feedback in intergroup interactions. Contributions and Implications on the Present Function This operate extends prior investigation on intergroup relations in a quantity of important methods. Whereas a substantial amount of study has examined how Whites’ racial attitudes, beliefs, and motivations for prejudiced (or nonprejudiced) behavior impact interracial interactions, person differences in ethnic minorities’ beliefs and their implications for interracial interactions have been fairly neglected within the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295272 psychological literature. The present operate extends prior study by focusing on variations within minority groups and individual by scenario interactions as determinants of cognition, affect, and physiology in intergroup interactions. The existing operate also extends prior investigation by focusing on how ethnic minorities respond to constructive evaluations in intergroup interactions. Findings highlight the limitations of assuming that all members of minority groups respond the exact same way in intergroup interactions. Despite the fact that quite a few research have examined the implications of Whites’ levels of internal and external motivations to avoid prejudice on their responses in interracial contexts (e.g Kunstman, Plant, Zielaskowski, LaCosse, 203; Plant, Devine, Peruche, 200), untilJ Exp Soc Psychol. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 207 January 0.Author TCS-OX2-29 Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMajor et al.Pagenow study has not examined the implications of minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ internal and external motivations for interracial interactions. They are the initial experiments to examine the association involving minorities’ suspicions about Whites’ motives and their reactions to constructive feedback directed toward themselves in intergroup interactions. Because the behavior on the interaction partner was held constant inside the existing studies, our findings illustrate the value of chronic perceptions of others’ motivations to respond devoid of prejudice. Results suggest two intriguing but as but untested possibilities. Initially, perceptions of motives may well be just as crucial as actual motives in shaping intergroup interactions. Second, suspicion of Whites’ motives for giving good feedback could clarify why minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ friendliness are inclined to rely extra heavily on nonverbal than verbal cues (Dovidio et al 2002). The latter may possibly be perceived as additional controllable, and hence as additional disingenuous. The existing investigation illustrates that chronically perceiving Whites’ positive responses toward ethnic minorities as disingenuous as motivated primarily by external issues with appearing unprejudiced is connected to elevated feelings of tension, uncertainty, and threat avoidance among minorities once they get positive evaluation.
