Onses to intergroup interactions. The present investigation also showed that Latinas
Onses to intergroup interactions. The present investigation also showed that Latinas’ beliefs about Whites’ motives Indolactam V web predicted greater threatavoidance following good feedback from Whites over and above individual differences in interpersonal rejection sensitivity (Experiment ), ethnic stigma consciousness (Experiment 2), and racebased rejection sensitivity (Experiment 3). As a result, though higher suspicion of Whites’ motives is modestly linked with additional adverse intergroup perceptions and greater racebased rejection expectations among minorities (Big et al 203), these research illustrate that suspicion of Whites’ motives for nonprejudiced behavior uniquely relates to responses to constructive feedback in intergroup interactions. Contributions and Implications from the Existing Perform This operate extends prior study on intergroup relations inside a quantity of important strategies. Whereas a substantial level of study has examined how Whites’ racial attitudes, beliefs, and motivations for prejudiced (or nonprejudiced) behavior impact interracial interactions, individual differences in ethnic minorities’ beliefs and their implications for interracial interactions have been relatively neglected in the social PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295272 psychological literature. The existing function extends prior research by focusing on differences within minority groups and individual by scenario interactions as determinants of cognition, influence, and physiology in intergroup interactions. The present operate also extends prior analysis by focusing on how ethnic minorities respond to optimistic evaluations in intergroup interactions. Findings highlight the limitations of assuming that all members of minority groups respond exactly the same way in intergroup interactions. Despite the fact that quite a few studies have examined the implications of Whites’ levels of internal and external motivations to prevent prejudice on their responses in interracial contexts (e.g Kunstman, Plant, Zielaskowski, LaCosse, 203; Plant, Devine, Peruche, 200), untilJ Exp Soc Psychol. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 207 January 0.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMajor et al.Pagenow study has not examined the implications of minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ internal and external motivations for interracial interactions. These are the first experiments to examine the association involving minorities’ suspicions about Whites’ motives and their reactions to optimistic feedback directed toward themselves in intergroup interactions. Since the behavior from the interaction partner was held constant within the current studies, our findings illustrate the value of chronic perceptions of others’ motivations to respond with no prejudice. Outcomes suggest two intriguing but as but untested possibilities. 1st, perceptions of motives may be just as crucial as actual motives in shaping intergroup interactions. Second, suspicion of Whites’ motives for giving positive feedback may explain why minorities’ perceptions of Whites’ friendliness have a tendency to rely far more heavily on nonverbal than verbal cues (Dovidio et al 2002). The latter may perhaps be perceived as more controllable, and hence as a lot more disingenuous. The current investigation illustrates that chronically perceiving Whites’ positive responses toward ethnic minorities as disingenuous as motivated mainly by external issues with appearing unprejudiced is related to increased feelings of strain, uncertainty, and threat avoidance amongst minorities after they get optimistic evaluation.
